A homeowner in Chengalpattu district challenged the order issued by the District Collector to lay high voltage lines on his land. The Chengalpattu Power Distribution Corporation had quoted a hefty sum of Rs. 81 lakhs for replacing the existing high voltage wires. The homeowner approached the Chennai High Court, which ruled in his favor. The court quashed the Collector's order and directed the power corporation to relocate the high voltage towers within eight weeks at their own expense. The court emphasized the importance of protecting individuals and their properties from the adverse effects of high voltage lines and stated that land or homeowners should not be burdened with the costs of such measures.
A significant legal victory was secured by a homeowner in Chengalpattu district who challenged the order issued by the District Collector to lay high voltage lines on his private land. The Chengalpattu Power Distribution Corporation had demanded a substantial sum of Rs. 81 lakhs for replacing the existing high voltage wires, citing the need for safety measures.
The homeowner, Shankar, approached the Chennai High Court to contest the corporation's demand. The court, after hearing arguments from both sides, issued a ruling that favored the homeowner. The judge quashed the Collector's order and directed the power corporation to relocate the high voltage towers within eight weeks.
The court emphasized the importance of protecting individuals and their properties from the potential hazards associated with high voltage lines. The judge stated that "high-voltage towers should be relocated to ensure that individuals and their properties are not adversely affected. Land or homeowners should not be asked to cover the costs associated with it."
This landmark ruling has significant implications for property owners across the state. It reaffirms the rights of individuals to protect their property from encroachments and ensures that the burden of safety measures does not fall solely on the shoulders of homeowners. The decision is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving similar disputes.